We take a risk-led approach to climate and supply chain challenges — focused on what could reasonably affect enterprise value, operational continuity, and decision-making. Our work is proportionate, defensible, and grounded in recognised risk frameworks.
Climate risk is treated as a core enterprise risk — not a standalone ESG exercise. We focus on how physical and transition risks interact with assets, operations, and supply chains, using established frameworks such as TCFD, IFRS S2, and AS/NZS ISO 31000.
We do not provide assurance, legal opinions, or engineering design. Our role is to support clear thinking, defensible prioritisation, and decision-useful outcomes.
Our work follows a structured but flexible methodology designed to translate climate and supply-chain risk into practical, defensible action.
We establish a proportionate scope grounded in how the organisation creates value — including assets, operations, and critical supply-chain dependencies — rather than defaulting to generic ESG boundaries.
Outcome: A clear, defensible scope aligned to real decisions.
We identify relevant physical and transition risks across the value chain using recognised risk frameworks and scenario-aware thinking, calibrated to the organisation’s size, sector, and maturity.
Outcome: A structured view of material climate risks suitable for governance and disclosure.
We assess how identified risks translate into real exposure — considering asset sensitivity, supplier concentration, geographic risk, and operational dependencies — without unnecessary modelling complexity.
Outcome: Clarity on where and how climate risk could realistically impact the business.
We prioritise risks based on likelihood, consequence, and controllability, and evaluate response options that are practical, proportionate, and aligned with existing business processes.
Outcome: A defensible basis for action, investment, and risk acceptance.
We support integration into governance, decision-making, and external reporting — ensuring climate risk informs capital allocation, procurement strategy, resilience planning, and disclosure without overstating certainty.
Outcome: Climate risk embedded where it matters, and able to stand up to scrutiny.
Our approach is designed to support informed decision-making — not just compliance. The outputs are practical, proportionate, and defensible under board and stakeholder scrutiny.
Whether you’re assessing transition risk, benchmarking strategy, or preparing for regulatory change, our research supports clear, defensible decisions.